The Fields Report

ABOUT | EMAIL | RSS | ATOM

GOOD READS

What turned Brent Scowcroft against the Bush Administration?

Moral Hazard
How conservatism encourages nuclear terrorism.

Return of the Fallen

Apocalypse Soon

by Robert McNamara

It is time for the United States to cease its Cold War-style reliance on nuclear weapons as a foreign-policy tool. Current U.S. nuclear weapons policy is immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous.

Is it really the case that, as the British tabloid the Daily Mirror famously put it, nearly 60 million Americans were simply too “dumb” to understand the implications of reelecting George W. Bush? It seems so...But as appealing as it is, folly does not constitute a sufficient explanation of the 2004 election.

Inside the Committee that Runs the World

September 11, 2001, was a catalytic event that revealed the core character of the Bush administration’s national security team. As rival factions fought for the president’s ear, the transformative ideals espoused by the neocons gained ascendancy—triggering a rift that has split the Republican foreign-policy establishment to its foundations.

The Right's Assault on Kofi Annan

The neoconservative and paleoconservative assault on Kofi Annan and the UN has been like a slightly slower version of the Swift Boat veterans' campaign against Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry. Listening to the cable pundits, you would never suspect that there is no proof at this point that Annan, or indeed anyone else at the UN, did anything wrong.

Think Again: Bush’s Foreign Policy

Not since Richard Nixon’s conduct of the war in Vietnam has a U.S. president’s foreign policy so polarized the country—and the world. Yet as controversial as George W. Bush’s policies have been, they are not as radical a departure from his predecessors as both critics and supporters proclaim. Instead, the real weaknesses of the president’s foreign policy lie in its contradictions: Blinded by moral clarity and hamstrung by its enormous military strength, the United States needs to rebalance means with ends if it wants to forge a truly effective grand strategy.

Will Iran Be Next?

Soldiers, spies, and diplomats conduct a classic Pentagon war game—with sobering results.

The Separate Realities of Bush and Kerry Supporters
A PIPA/KN Study

Bush's Lost Year

By deciding to invade Iraq, the Bush Administration decided not to do many other things: not to reconstruct Afghanistan, not to deal with North Korea and Iran, and not to wage an effective war on terror. An inventory of opportunities lost.

Iran: Time for a New Approach

Council on Foreign Relations

The lack of sustained engagement with Iran harms American interests, and direct dialogue with Tehran on specific areas of mutual concern should be pursued.

The Misunderestimated Man: How Bush chose stupidity

As the president says, we misunderestimate him. He was not born stupid. He chose stupidity. Bush may look like a well-meaning dolt. On consideration, he's something far more dangerous: a dedicated fool.

LINKS

Arts & Letters Daily

Atlantic Monthly

Best of Craigslist

Carnegie Endowment for Int'l Peace

Center for American Progress

CJR Campaign Desk

Council on Foreign Relations

Foreign Affairs

Informed Comment

Middle East Media Research Institute

New York Review of Books

NYT INT'L NEWS

GOOD STUFF

ARCHIVES

Monday, March 29, 2004

The White House gamble that it can give a lame excuse for trying to link Saddam and al-Qaida immediately after 9/11 is working because no one will follow up with “logical” questions.

The White House acknowledged Sunday that on the day after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President Bush asked his top counterterrorism adviser, Richard A. Clarke, to find out whether Iraq was involved.

Mr. Bush wanted to know "did Iraq have anything to do with this? Were they complicit in it?" Condoleezza Rice, the president's national security adviser, recounted in an interview on CBS' "60 Minutes."
Mr. Bush was not trying to intimidate anyone to "produce information," she said. Rather, given the United States' "actively hostile relationship" with Iraq at the time, he was asking Mr. Clarke "a perfectly logical question," Ms. Rice said.

This is the second time I’ve raised this question. But wouldn’t a more “logical” question be, find out if Iran or Libya did this – especially the former given their ties to Hizballah, which Richard Armitage continues to characterize as the “A-team” of international terrorism. Dr. Rice?

# posted 1:44 PM